ELEKTRİK TÜKETİMİ İLE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ: ÜST ORTA GELİR GRUBU ÜLKELER PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-1
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2019-05-07 16:41:13.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu :
Number of pages: 1-10
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Çalışmanın temel amacı Türkiye’nin de içinde yer aldığı Üst Orta Gelirli ülkeler için Elektirik tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılmasıdır. Bu nedenle 1971-2014 dönemi için 22 üst orta gelirli ülkeye ait Elektrik tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme değişkenlerinden yararlanılarak oluşturulan panel veri modeli analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analizde öncelikle serilerin yatay kesit bağımlılığı Pesaran CD (2004)testi ve homojenliği Pesaran ve Yamagata (2008) Homohenlik testi ile araştırılmıştır. Serilerin yatay kesit ve heterojenite içerdikleri belirlendiği için analizlere yatay kesit bağımlılığını dikkate alan CADF birim kök testi yöntemiyle sınanmış ve serilerin birinci farkta durağan seriler oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Serilerin uzun dönem ilişkisi ise Westerlund ve Edgerton (2007) Eş Bütünleşme Testi ile değerlendirilmiş; seriler arasımda eşbütünleşme ilişkisi saptanamamıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensellik ilişkileri; Dumitrescu ve Hurlin (2012) panel nedensellik testi yardımı ile incelenmiş elektrik tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme değişkenleri arasında çift yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak üst orta gelirli ülkeler için Geri Bildirim (Feed Back) hipotezinin geçerli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth for uppur middle income countries that Turkey belongs. For this reason, panel data model which is formed by using electricity consumption and economic growth variables of 22 upper middle income countries for the period 1971-2014 was analyzed. In the analysis, firstly the horizontal cross-section dependence of the series was investigated by using the Pesaran and Yamagata (2008) Homohenity test. As the series were determined to contain cross-sectional and heterogeneity, it was tested by CADF unit root test method which considers the cross-sectional dependency of the analyzes and it was determined that the series were the first stationary series. The long-term relationship of the series was evaluated by Westerlund and Edgerton (2007) Co-Integration Test; There was no cointegration relationship between the series. Causality relations between variables; Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel causality test examined the power consumption and economic growth variables were determined as a bidirectional causality relationship. As a result, it is concluded that Feed Back hypothesis is valid for upper middle income countries.

Keywords


  • Acaravci, A., Ozturk, I., (2010). Electricity consumption-growth nexus, evidence from panel data for

  • Acaravci, A., Ozturk, I., (2010). Electricity consumption-growth nexus, evidence from panel data for transition countries. Energy Econ. 32, 604–608.

  • Apergis, N. ve. Payne, J. E. (2010). Energy consumption and growth in South America: Evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Economics 32, 1421–1426.

  • Apergis, N., Payne, J.E., (2011). A dynamic panel study of economic development and the electricity consumption-growth nexus. Energy Econ. 33, 770–781.

  • Azam, M., Khan, A. Q. , Bakhtya, B. ve Emirullah, C. (2015). The causal relationship between

  • Behmiri, N.B., Manso, J.R.P., (2013). How crude oil consumption impacts on economic growth of Sub-Saharan Africa? Energy 54, 78–83.

  • Bildirici, M.E., Bakirtas, T., Kayikci, F., (2012). Economic growth and electricity consumption, auto- regressive distributed lag analysis. J. Energy South. Afr. 23, 29–45.

  • Chen, S.T., Kuo, H.I., Chen, C.C., (2007). The relationship between GDP and electricity consumption in 10 Asian countries. Energy Policy 35, 2611–2621.

  • Cheng-Lang, Y., Lin, H.-P., Chang, C.-H., (2010). Linear and non-linear causality between sectoral

  • electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Policy 38, 6570–6573.Ciarreta, A., Zarraga, Z., (2010). Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Spain. Appl. Econ. Lett. 17, 1417–1421.

  • Dumitrescu, E., Hurlin, C., ()2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model. 29, 1450–1460.

  • Eggoh, J. C., Bangake, C. Ve Rault, C. (2011). Energy consumption and economic growth revisited in African countries. Energy Policy 39, 7408–7421.

  • Fuinhas, J. A. ve Marques, A. C. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth nexus in

  • Portugal, Italy, Greece, Spain and Turkey: An ARDL bounds test approach (1965–2009). Energy Economics 34,511–517.

  • Ismaila, A. G., Rashid, A. A. ve Hanif, A. (2017). Electricity consumption and economic growth in ASEAN. Journal of Emerging Economies & Islamic Research 5(2), 16 – 27

  • Jamil, F., Ahmad, E., (2011). The relationship between electricity consumption, electricity prices and GDP in Pakistan. Energy Policy 38, 6016–6025.

  • Jumbe, C.B.L., (2004). Cointegration and causality between electricity consumption and GDP, empirical evidence from Malawi. Energy Econ. 26, 61–68.

  • Kraft, J., Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 3, 401–403.

  • Kahsai, M.S., Nondo, C., Schaeffer, P. V., ve Gebremedhin, T.G. (2012). Income level and the energyconsumption-GDP nexus: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa, Energy Economics, 34(3), 739-746.Keho, Y. (2016). What drives energy consumption in developing countries? The experience of selected African countries. Energy Policy 91, 233–246.

  • Kouakou, A.K., (2011). Economic growth and electricity consumption in Côte d'Ivoire, evidence from time series analysis. Energy Policy 39, 3638–3644.

  • Kumar, R. R., Stauvermann, P. S. Loganathan, N. ve Kumar, D. K.(2015). Exploring the role of

  • Lee, C.-C., Lee, J.-D., (2010). A panel data analysis of the demand for total energy and electricity in OECD countries. Energy J. 31, 1–24.

  • Mahadevan, R., Asafu-Adjaye, J., (2007). Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a

  • Narayan, P. K. Ve Smyth, R. (2009). Multivariate granger causality between electricity consumption,exports and GDP: Evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries. Energy Policy 37, 229–236.Nasreen, S. ve Anwar, S. (2014). Causal relationship between trade openness, economic growth and energy consumption: A panel data analysis of Asian countries . Energy Policy 69, 82–91

  • Ouédraogo, M., (2010). Electricity consumption and economic growth in Burkina Faso, a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ. 3, 524–531.

  • Ozturk, İ., Acaravci, A., (2011). Electricity consumption and real GDP causality nexus, evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach for 11 MENA countries. Appl. Energy 88,

  • Payne, J.E., (2010). A survey of the electricity consumption-growth literature. Appl. Energy 87, 3723–Pesaran, M.H., (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

  • Pesaran, M.H., Yamagata, T., (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J. Econ. 142, 50–93. Polemis, M.L., Dagoumas, A., (2013). The electricity consumption and economic growth nexus,

  • Rahman, M. M. ve Mamun, S. A. K. (2016). Energy use, international trade and economic growth

  • RAZ, S.A., Shahbaz, M. ve Nguyen, D. K. (2014). Energy Conservation Policies, Growth and TradePerformance: Evidence of Feedback Hypothesis in Pakistan. Şubat 2014. Erişim 10 Ocak 2018, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58671/.

  • Rufael, Y. W. (2009). Energy consumption and economic growth: The experience of African countries revisited. Energy Economics 31, 217–224.

  • Rufael, Y. W. (2014). Electricity consumption and economic growth in transition countries: A revisit using bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis. Energy Economics 44, 325–330.

  • Sadorsky, P. (2011). Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics 33,739–Sari, R., Soytas, U., (2004). Disaggregate energy consumption, employment, and income in Turkey. Energy Econ. 26, 335–344.

  • Shahbaz, M., Feridun, M.,( 2012). Electricity consumption and economic growth empirical evidence from Pakistan. Qual. Quant. Int. J. Methodol. 46, 1583–1599.

  • Shiu, A., Lam, P.L., (2004). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy Policy 32, 47–54.

  • Siddique, H. M. A. ve Majeed, M. T. (2015). Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Trade and

  • Squalli, J., (2007). Electricity consumption and economic growth, bounds and causality analysis of OPEC countries. Energy Econ. 29, 1192–1205.

  • Tang, C.F., (2008). A re-examination of the relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in Malaysia. Energy Policy 36, 3077–3085.

  • UCAN, O., ARICIOGLU,E. ve YUCEL, F.(2014). Energy Consumption and Economic Growth

  • Westerlund J. ve Edgerton D.L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters Volume 97 (3), 185-190.

  • Wolde-Rufael, Y., (2009). Energy consumption and economic growth: the experience of African countries revisited. Energy Econ. 31, 217–224.

  • World Bank, 2018. World Development Indicators. Erişim:20.01.2018, https://data.worldbank.org/

  • Yoo, S., Kwak, S., 2010. Electricity consumption and economic growth in seven South American countries. Energy Policy 38, 180–188.

  • Zachariadis, T., Pashourtidou, N., 2007. An empirical analysis of electricity consumption in Cyprus. Energy Econ. 29, 183–198.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics