AHP, CRITIC VE WEDBA YÖNTEMLERİNİ İÇEREN ENTEGRE BİR ÇKKV MODELİ İLE AXA SİGORTA ŞİRKETİNİN FİNANSAL PERFORMANSININ ANALİZİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-12-30 13:30:00.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Finans
Number of pages: 892-908
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Dinamik ve rekabetçi bir ortamda faaliyet gösteren sigorta şirketlerinin pazardaki rekabet güçlerini artırmak için performansını sistematik olarak değerlendirmeleri finansal piyasaların gelişmesine ve büyümesine katkı sağlayarak güçlü bir finansal sistemin oluşmasına ve ekonomik istikrarın tesis edilmesine olanak sağlar. Bu çalışmada Türk sigorta sektörünün öncü ve lider şirketlerinden biri olan Axa sigorta şirketinin 2011-2020 dönemine ilişkin finansal performansının yeni bir hibrid ÇKKV modeli ile değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada öncelikle iki ağırlıklandırma yöntemini dengelemek için finansal kriterlerin ağırlık katsayılarının belirlenmesinde iki ağırlıklandırma yöntemi (sübjektif (AHP) ve objektif (CRITIC)) entegre edilmiştir. Ayrıca, literatürde herhangi bir ÇKKV problemini çözmek için nadiren kullanılan WEDBA metodolojisi bu çalışmada kullanılmış ve böylece literatüre yeni bir entegre ÇKKV modeli tanıtılmıştır. AHP-CRITIC-WEDBA modelinden elde edilen bulgulara göre Axa sigortanın finansal açıdan en başarılı (başarısız) olduğu yıl 2016 (2012) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak 2011-2020 dönemini kapsayan 10 yıllık dönem için Axa sigortanın finansal performansında önemli istikrarsızlıkların yaşandığı ifade edilebilir.

Keywords

Abstract

The systematic evaluation of the performance of insurance companies operating in a dynamic and competitive environment in order to increase their competitiveness in the market contributes to the development and growth of financial markets, enabling the formation of a strong financial system and the establishment of economic stability. In this study, it is aimed to assess the financial performance of Axa insurance company, one of the pioneering and leading companies of the Turkish insurance industry, for the period of 2011-2020 with a new hybrid MCDM model. In the study, firstly, two weighting methods (subjective (AHP) and objective (CRITIC)) were integrated in determining the weighting coefficients of financial criteria in order to balance the two weighting methods. In addition, the WEDBA methodology, which is rarely used in the literature to solve any MCDM problem, was used in this study and thus a new integrated MCDM model was introduced to the literature. Based on the findings obtained from the AHP-CRITIC-WEDBA model, the most successful (unsuccessful) year of Axa insurance was determined as 2016 (2012). As a result, it can be stated that there are significant instabilities in the financial performance of Axa Sigorta for the 10-year period covering the 2011-2020 period.

Keywords


  • Adem, A., & Dağdeviren, M. (2016). “A Life İnsurance Policy Selection Via Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Decision Making Model”. Procedia Computer Science, 102: 398-405.

  • Akbulut, O. Y. (2019). “CRITIC ve EDAS Yöntemleri Ile İş Bankası'nın 2009-2018 Yılları Arasındaki Performansının Analizi”. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2): 249-263.

  • Akbulut, O. Y. (2020). “Finansal Performans İle Pay Senedi Getirisi Arasindaki İlişkinin Bütünleşik CRITIC ve MABAC ÇKKV Teknikleriyle Ölçülmesi: Borsa İstanbul Çimento Sektörü Firmalari Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (40): 471-488.

  • Akyüz, G., & Tosun, Ö. (2020).” Performance Evaluation of Non-Life Insurance Companies With BEST-WORST METHOD And TOPSIS”. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 16(1): 108-125.

  • Ali, T., Chiu, Y. R., Aghaloo, K., Nahian, A. J., & Ma, H. (2020). Prioritizing the existing power generation technologies in Bangladesh’s clean energy scheme using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121901.

  • Al-Hawari, T., Naji, A., Alshraideh, H., & Bataineh, O. (2019). “Extending the WEDBA to the Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Environment”. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 59(4): 330-346.

  • Axa Sigorta Şirketi Finansal Raporları, (ASŞFR), 2020, https://www.axasigorta.com.tr/media/t1/001/624/256/407/AXA%20Sigorta%20ve%20Hayat %20ve%20Emeklilik%202020%20Faaliyet%20Raporu%20Haziran%202021.pdf (01.12.2021).

  • Al-Shammari, M., & Mili, M. (2021). “A fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model For Customers’ Bank Selection Decision in the Kingdom of Bahrain”. Operational Research, 21(3): 1429-1446.

  • Anser, M. K., Mohsin, M., Abbas, Q., & Chaudhry, I. S. (2020). “Assessing the integration of Solar Power Projects: SWOT-Based AHP–F-TOPSIS Case Study of Turkey”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25): 31737-31749.

  • Bagheri, M., Zaiton Ibrahim, Z., Mansor, S., Manaf, L. A., Akhir, M. F., Talaat, W. I. A. W., & Beiranvand Pour, A. (2021). “Land-Use Suitability Assessment Using Delphi and Analytical Hierarchy Process (D-AHP) Hybrid Model for Coastal City Management: Kuala Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia”. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(9): 1-35.

  • Che, Z., Wang, H. S., & Chuang, C. L. (2010). “A Fuzzy AHP and DEA Approach For Making Bank Loan Decisions For Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan”. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10): 7189-7199.

  • Çalık, A., & Paksoy, T. (2017). Aralık Tip-2 Bulanık AHP Yöntemi ile Üçüncü Parti Tersine Lojistik (3PTL) Firma Seçimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 20(1): 52-67.

  • Calik, A. (2018). Otomotiv Tedarik Zincirinde Risk Değerlendirmesi için Bulanık AHP ve TOPSIS ile Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4): 868-886.

  • Çalık, A., Çizmecioğlu, S., & Akpınar, A. (2019). An integrated AHP‐TOPSIS framework for foreign direct investment in Turkey. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(5-6): 296-307.

  • Çalık, A. (2021). “A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology for Green Supplier Selection in the Industry 4.0 era”. Soft Computing, 25(3): 2253-2265.

  • Çamlıbel, S. (2021). Comparison of Management and Financial Performance in the Turkish Insurance Sector: An Example of Clusterıng Analysis. International Journal of Insurance and Finance, 1(2): 21-38.

  • Dağdeviren, M., & Yüksel, İ. (2008). “Developing a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Behavior-Based Safety Management”. Information Sciences, 178(6): 1717-1733.

  • Deepa, N., Ganesan, K., Srinivasan, K., & Chang, C. Y. (2019). “Realizing Sustainable Development Via Modified İntegrated Weighting MCDM Model for Ranking Agrarian Dataset”. Sustainability, 11(21): 6060.

  • Demir, G. (2021). “Vakıf Üniversitelerinde Akademik Performans Analizi: CRITIC-WEDBA Bütünleşik Model Uygulaması”: Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1): 39-50.

  • Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). “Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The CRITIC Method”. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7): 763-770.

  • Dwivedi, R., Prasad, K., Mandal, N., Singh, S., Vardhan, M., & Pamucar, D. (2021). “Performance Evaluation of an İnsurance Company Using an İntegrated Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and BestWorst Method (BWM). Decision Making”: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1): 33-50.

  • Ecer, F. (2014). “A Hybrid Banking Websites Quality Evaluation Model Using AHP and COPRAS-G: a Turkey Case”. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4): 758-782.

  • Ecer, F. (2020). Çok Kriterli Karar Vermede Geçmişten Günümüze Kapsamlı Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2021). “MARCOS technique Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment for Determining The COVID-19 Pandemic Performance Of Insurance Companies in Terms of Healthcare Services”. Applied Soft Computing, 104: 107199.

  • Garbuzova-Schlifter, M., & Madlener, R. (2016). “AHP-Based Risk Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Projects in Russia”. Energy Policy, 97: 559-581.

  • Garg, R. (2017). “Optimal Selection of E‐Learning Websites Using Multiattribute Decision‐Making Approaches”. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(3-4): 187-196.

  • Gharizadeh Beiragh, R., Alizadeh, R., Shafiei Kaleibari, S., Cavallaro, F., Zolfani, S. H., Bausys, R., & Mardani, A. (2020). “An İntegrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model For Sustainability Performance Assessment For İnsurance Companies”. Sustainability, 12(3): 789.

  • Ghosh, A. (2021). “Analyzing Efficiency of Indian Life Insurance Companies using DEA and SEM”. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(12): 3897-3919.

  • Gupta, A., Gupta, N., & Garg, R. K. (2018). “Implementing Weighted Entropy-Distance Based Approach For The Selection Of Software Reliability Growth Models”. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 57(3): 255-266.

  • Gupta, S., Vijayvargy, L., & Gupta, K. (2021). “Assessment of Stress Level in Urban Area’s During COVID-19 Outbreak Using CRITIC and TOPSIS: A Case of Indian Cities”. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 24(2): 411-433.

  • Hatemi‐J, A., Lee, C. C., Lee, C. C., & Gupta, R. (2019). Insurance activity and economic performance: Fresh evidence from asymmetric panel causality tests. International Finance, 22(2): 221-240.

  • Işık Tuş, A. (2016). “QUALIFLEX and ORESTE Methods For The İnsurance Company Selection Problem”. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(2): 55-68.

  • Işık, Ö. (2019). “Türkiye'de Hayat Dışı Sigorta Sektörünün Finansal Performansının CRITIC Tabanlı TOPSIS ve MULTIMOORA Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(1): 542-562.

  • Işık, Ö. (2021). “Analysing the Determinants of Profitability of Domestic and Foreign Non-Life Insurers in Turkey”. International Journal of Insurance and Finance, 1(1): 45-55.

  • Işık, Ö., & Ersoy, E. (2020). “Özel Sermayeli Mevduat Bankalarında Faiz Gelir ve Giderlerine Dayalı Performans Analizi: CRITIC ve EDAS Yöntemleri ile Bir Uygulama”. Karaca, SS ve Demireli E.(Yay. haz.), Finans Teorisine Uygulamalı Katkılar-2 içinde, 69-89.

  • Jain, V., & Ajmera, P. (2019). “Application of MADM Methods as MOORA and WEDBA for Ranking of FMS Flexibility”. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(2): 119-136.

  • Kara, İ., & Ecer, F. (2016). “AHP-VIKOR Entegre Yöntemi ile Tedarikçi Seçimi: Tekstil Sektörü Uygulaması”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2): 255-272.

  • Karakış, E. (2021). “Machine Selection for a Textile Company with CRITIC and MAUT Methods”. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (27): 842-848.

  • Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2017). “Assessment of Third-Party Logistics Providers Using a CRITIC–WASPAS Approach with İnterval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets”. Transport, 32(1): 66-78.

  • Khamoie, F., Shokrolah Tabar Aktij, M., Moazeni, B., & Sehhat, S. (2018). “An Application of DEA- MCDM Compilation Model for Evaluating Relative Efficiency and Ranking of Iranian Insurance Companies”. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research, 33(2): 1-22.

  • Korhonen, P., & Voutilainen, R. (2006). “Finding The Most Preferred Alliance Structure Between Banks And İnsurance Companies”. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2): 12851299.

  • Kumaran, S. (2021). “Financial Performance Index of IPO Firms Using VIKOR-CRITIC Techniques”. Finance Research Letters: 102542.

  • Liaw, C. F., Hsu, W. C. J., & Lo, H. W. (2020). “A Hybrid MCDM Model to Evaluate and Classify Outsourcing Providers in Manufacturing”. Symmetry, 12(12): 1962.

  • Lyu, H. M., Zhou, W. H., Shen, S. L., & Zhou, A. N. (2020).” Inundation Risk Assessment of Metro System Using AHP and TFN-AHP in Shenzhen”. Sustainable Cities and Society, 56: 102103.

  • Mandić, K., Delibašić, B., Knežević, S., & Benković, S. (2017). “Analysis of The Efficiency Of Insurance Companies In Serbia Using The Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Methods”. Economic research-Ekonomskaistraživanja, 30(1): 550-565.

  • Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). “A Novel Approach İntegrating AHP and TOPSIS Under Spherical Fuzzy Sets for Advanced Manufacturing System Selection”. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 96: 103988.

  • Mimovic, P., Tadic, D., Borota-Tisma, A., Nestic, S., & Lafuente, J. G. (2021).” Evaluation and Ranking of İnsurance Companies by Combining TOPSIS and the İnterval Fuzzy Rough Sets”. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2): 279-299.

  • Oztaysi, B. (2014). “A Decision Model For İnformation Technology Selection Using AHP İntegrated TOPSIS-Grey: The Case of Content Management Systems”. Knowledge-Based Systems, 70:

  • Özbek, A., & Eren, T. (2012). “Üçüncü Parti Lojistik (3PL) Firmanın Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreciyle (AHS) Belirlenmesi”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 4(2):

  • Özispa, N., & Arabelen, G. (2021). “Limanların Sürdürülebilirlik Stratejilerinin AHP Yaklaşımı ile Önceliklendirilmesi”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 16(63): 1430-1453.

  • Pattnaik, C. R., Mohanty, S. N., Mohanty, S., Chatterjee, J. M., Jana, B., & Diaz, V. G. (2021). “A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Purchasing Life İnsurance in India”. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(1): 344-356.

  • Peng, X., Zhang, X., & Luo, Z. (2020). “Pythagorean Fuzzy MCDM Method Based on CoCoSo and CRITIC with Score Function for 5G İndustry Evaluation”. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(5):

  • Podgórski, D. (2015). “Measuring Operational Performance of OSH Management System–A Demonstration of AHP-Based Selection of Leading Key Performance Indicators”. Safety science, 73: 146-166.

  • Rao, R. V., & Singh, D. (2011). “Evaluating Flexible Manufacturing Systems Using Euclidean Distance- Based İntegrated Approach”. International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management, 3(1-2): 32-53.

  • Saaty, T. (1986), “Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, 32(7): 841- 855.

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGrawHill.

  • Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

  • Saaty, T. L., Penıwatı, K. And Shang, J. S. (2007), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Human Resource Allocation: Half the Story”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46: 1041–1053.

  • Solangi, Y. A., Longsheng, C., & Shah, S. A. A. (2021). “Assessing and overcoming The Renewable Energy Barriers for Sustainable Development in Pakistan: An integrated AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach”. Renewable Energy, 173: 209-222.

  • Torbati, A. R., & Sayadi, M. K. (2018). “A New Approach To İnvestigate The Performance of İnsurance Branches in Iran Using Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy İnference System”. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems, 5(4): 13-18.

  • Ulutaş, A. (2020). “Stacker Selection with PSI and WEDBA Methods”. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(2): 493-504.

  • Ulutaş, A., & Karaköy, Ç. (2019). “CRITIC ve ROV Yöntemleri ile Bir Kargo Firmasının 2011-2017 Yılları Sırasındaki Performansının Analiz Edilmesi”. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar

  • Zafar, S., Alamgir, Z., & Rehman, M. H. (2021). “An Effective Blockchain Evaluation System Based on Entropy-CRITIC Weight Method and MCDM Techniques”. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14: 3110–3123

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics