Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmada girişimcilik kavramının akademideki yansıması olan akademik girişimcilik TÜBİTAK bilimsel destekleri bağlamında ele alınmıştır. TÜBİTAK akademik girişimciliği desteklemek amacıyla akademisyenlerin bilimsel projelerine destek sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada bu desteklerin ülke çapındaki dağıtımının adaleti sorgulanmaktadır. Bu sorgulama yapılırken TÜBİTAK’ın 2011-2015 yılları arasında dağıttığı destekler kullanılmıştır. Bu destek verilerinden faydalanılarak her yıl için Gini katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca Gini değerlerini yıllara göre değişiminin sebeplerini vermek için şehirler bazında kişi başına düşen akademik destek miktarları incelenmiştir. Bu incelemenin sonucunda özellikle Ankara, Kocaeli ve Isparta’nın TÜBİTAK destek dağılımının adaletini bozan şehirler olduğu görülmüştür. Yine Hakkari, Şırnak, Muş, Mardin ve Amasya gibi illerin desteklerden en az faydalandıklarından dolayı Gini katsayısını yükselttiği anlaşılmaktadır. Tunceli’nin coğrafi konumuna rağmen son yıllarda ciddi bir yükseliş sergilediği de dikkatten kaçırılmamalıdır. Ayrıca bu çalışmada, alanyazında ilk kez TÜBİTAK desteklerinin dağıtımın eşitliğini sınama amacıyla Gini katsayısı hesaplanmıştır.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, a specialized entrepreneurship concept academic entrepreneurship, has been evaluated in the context of TÜBİTAK’s Scientific Funding. Scientific and technological research council of Turkey has funded scientific projects for supporting academic entrepreneurship. In this study the equity of the Fund Distribution has been examined. For this aim the data from TUBITAK for funds of 2011-2015 time span has used. Gini coefficients for every years in this time interval has calculated with utilizing this funding data. In addition to this funding amount per capita for cities has examined to find the causes of high Gini values. As a result of this calculation, Ankara, Kocaeli and Isparta cities are the most ruiner of the TUBITAK Scientific Fund Distribution’s fairness. Albeit Hakkari, Şırnak, Muş, Mardin and Amasya are the cities which raises the Gini Coefficient, with their short of funding. An interesting finding is the funds sent to Tunceli has been dramatically raised recent years, although its geographic location. Besides this study is the first study in Turkish Literature which is examining the fairness of the TUBİTAK Scientific Funds Distribution with using the Gini Coefficient.
Keywords
- BECKMAN GD, C. R. (2009). Intellectual entrepreneurship: an authentic foundation for higher education reform. Plan High Educ.
- CAMPBELL, D. F. (2005). Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the" scientification" of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management , 152-175.
- CARAYANNİS, E. G. (2013). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
- LİNK, A. N. (2003). US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of industrial organization, 1323-1356.
- LİNK, A. N. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 661-674.
- LİNK, A. N. (2015). The Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- SHANE, S. A. (2004.). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. . Celtenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- STUART, T. E. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 112.1, 97-144.
- UKSPA. (2016, 5 28). http://www.ukspa.org.uk. 5 28, 2016 tarihinde ukspa.org: http://www.ukspa.org.uk/members/our- members adresinden alındı
- VENKATARAMAN, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth 3.1, 119-138.
- WATTS, D. J. (1999). Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Network Between Order and Randomness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- DRUCKER, P. (1985). "Entrepreneurship and innovation: Practice and principles." NY: Harper Business.
- D'ESTE, P., SURYA, M., AND NEELY., A. (2009). "Academic entrepreneurship: what are the factors shaping the capacity of academic researchers to identify and exploit entrepreneurial opportunities?." Biblioteca Digital de la Asociación Latino-Iberoamericana de Gestión Tecnológica 1.1
- MURRAY, F., KOLEV., J., (2015). "An Entrepreneur’s Guide to the University."The Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship.
- STUART, T. E., DİNG., W.W., (2006). "When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences1." American Journal of Sociology 112.1
- LANDSTROM, H. (2007). Pioneers in entrepreneurship and small business research. Vol. 8. Springer Science & Business Media
- SHAPERO, A. (1975). "The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur." Psychology today 9.6
- KENNEY, M., AND GOE., W.R. (2004). "The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford." Research Policy 33.5 691-707.
- SHANE, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar Publishing
- İSKENDER, E., BATI., G.B. (2015). "Comparing Turkish Universities Entrepreneurship and Innovativeness Index's Ran- kings with Sentiment Analysis Results on Social Media." Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 15431552.
- TÜBİTAK. (2016). 1 6, 2016 tarihinde https://www.tubitak.gov.tr: https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/destekler/sanayi/ulusal- destek-programlari/icerik-1513-teknoloji-transfer-ofisleri-destekleme-programi adresinden alındı
- TÜBİTAK. (2016). 4 27, 2016 tarihinde https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/ardeb_stat_2016_11.pdf adresinden
